Welcome to your ultimate Idaho travel resource
 

Welcom to our Idaho Archive. Have fun browsing!

 

Article #453: Death Penalty

(Browse for more articles)

 
Death penalty is an irrevocable crime relatives and supporters of the convict's
which many people argue its effectiveness innocence. Whatever the reason for
in deterring future crimes. It became a execution is, it always leaves a negative
very important issue for the human rights physiologically affect on the
associations such as, "Amnesty individual's supporters. Think of the
International", which is working daughter or son of someone executed
worldwide to protect human rights and whether he is innocent or not. These
abolishing death penalty. According the children are affected by the way society
facts of "Amnesty International", today punishes and might become potential
111 countries have abolished the death enemies to the system. Life-time
penalty in law or practice. That leaves imprisonment without parole seems like a
84 other countries which retain or use much better alternative. As long as,
death penalty (Amnesty International). there is no place for mistakes in the
There are also "victim's rights" decision, supporters still argue that the
organizations, which support the use death penalty is the best alternative.
death penalty. It became an important Victim's rights organizations are mostly
debate lately. Therefore, we should know made up of people who had been affected
the consequences of abolishing death by some kind of crimes. It is not strange
penalty such as its benefits and threats that people who lost their loved ones
to the society, its effectiveness and its will behave emotionally and support the
role in the international arena. death penalty. "An eye for an eye"
Individuals and organizations who oppose mentality is the basic reason these
the death penalty claim that it violates people support death penalty. After the
the right to life as proclaimed in the pain, they can no longer take a neutral
Universal Declaration of Human Rights. stand and think about the issue clearly.
They also claim that it is an inhuman Death penalty supporters are also
punishment which is ineffective in bothered because they believe life-time
deterring future crimes. imprisonment of criminals is a waste of
Those, who support the death penalty, taxpayer's money. They prefer criminals
claim that death penalty is effective in to be sent to death row than being taken
deterring future crimes and keep the care of for a life-time (Thibault).
society a better place to live in. They Although many organizations define the
also believe that there should be death penalty an unusual punishment, some
alternative punishments for different supporters argue that the framers of the
crimes and death penalty is a kind of constitution supported death penalty and
punishment some criminals deserve. constructed laws to practice it, so it is
While opponents claim there is no solid not unusual. Supreme Court Justice
evidence of deterrence, people who Antonin Scalia, after reviewing Callins
support the death penalty argue that our v. Collins case, observed that:
society is not able to see the results of The Fifth Amendment provides that '[n]o
what is not happening. This is like persons shall be held to answer for a
hearing the news of the shipwrecks, but capital...crime, unless on a presentment
not hearing any news on the ones that or indictment of a Grand Jury...nor be
arrived safely to the harbor. deprived of life...without the due
Practice of death penalty always carries process of law.' This clearly permits
the risk of taking innocent lives. Cooper the death penalty to be imposed, and
shows proof of this risk when she says, establishes beyond doubt that the death
"75 people were released from death row penalty is not one of the 'cruel and
after courts reversed their convictions" unusual punishments' prohibited by the
(Cooper). Those, who support the death Eighth Amendment (Scalia).
penalty, believe that it is extremely a One other issue is that United States has
small risk and it is decreasing as not abolished the death penalty for
forensic science improves. They also youths. Juveniles do not have the same
believe that execution of an innocent moral reasoning as adults so there should
inmate is a even smaller chance than the be an alternative way of punishing them.
releasing a criminal. This is credited to According to Schiraldi, this does not
the careful observations made before the look good on the international arena as
execution. The Jogger case is an example well. He states this well, where he says:
of false convictions. "...the faulty "Over the last three years, aside from
convictions of five teenagers in 1989 the United States, only Pakistan, Iran
would have never come to light" and the Republic of Congo have executed
(Halpern). juvenile offenders --hardly the kind of
Organizations such as the "Amnesty human rights company we should be
International" show the fact that, "death keeping" (Schiraldi).
penalty punishes the poor" as a reason to Abolishing the death penalty is a
abolish it. Good judicial representation requirement for joining the European
often results in less or no penalty, but Union. Republic of Turkey, who was
it costs too much to be represented by a waiting at the gates of the European
good lawyer. This situation might result Union for a longtime, has taken steps to
in changing a death row sentence to a abolish death penalty although it has not
life long imprisonment for a wealthy been practiced for a long time.
criminal. According to Mary H. Cooper, Abolishing the death penalty and practice
"poor inmates often do not receive of human rights laws is becoming a more
adequate legal counsel" (Cooper). important issue in the international
Victim's rights organizations argue that arena. "Turkey has been praised for laws
the death penalty, in fact, does not adopted in August to abolish death
discriminate the poor. This accusation penalty in peacetime" (Houston
can not be an argument against death Chronicle).
penalty because it is an argument against I believe it is not possible to end
all types of punishment. The only way to killings by executing murders. For a
solve this issue is to improve the better society, we should be more
justice system, which is not easily done. responsible for human rights. Even
Fairness of death penalty is also though, it is a very small risk that the
questionable because the prosecutor may executed will be innocent, I believe it
choose to go for the death penalty or is not worth it. It is also becoming a
life-time imprisonment. Some prosecutors necessity to abolish death penalty for
always seek for the death penalty and the sake of humanity in the international
others may never consider this penalty, arena. Every country should take further
this circumstance discriminates between steps to act according to United Nations'
types of prosecution. There is also Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
evidence that "prosecutors seek for death United States should not be in the same
penalty more frequently when the victim class of countries who practice death
is black than when the victim is white" penalty and be an example as it is in
(Cooper). other issues. Death penalty should be
Another threat of the death penalty to abolished at all so that it will no more
society is the effect of the execution on be an alternative to kill for vengeance.






1 - A - B - C - D - E - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 - 39 - 40 - 41 - 42 - 43 - 44 - 45 -