Death Penalty

Death penalty is an irrevocable crime which manysupporters of the convict's innocence. Whatever
people argue its effectiveness in deterring futurethe reason for execution is, it always leaves a
crimes. It became a very important issue for thenegative physiologically affect on the individual's
human rights associations such as, "Amnestysupporters. Think of the daughter or son of
International", which is working worldwide tosomeone executed whether he is innocent or not.
protect human rights and abolishing death penalty.These children are affected by the way society
According the facts of "Amnesty International",punishes and might become potential enemies to
today 111 countries have abolished the deaththe system. Life-time imprisonment without parole
penalty in law or practice. That leaves 84 otherseems like a much better alternative. As long as,
countries which retain or use death penaltythere is no place for mistakes in the decision,
(Amnesty International). There are also "victim'ssupporters still argue that the death penalty is the
rights" organizations, which support the use deathbest alternative.
penalty. It became an important debate lately.Victim's rights organizations are mostly made up
Therefore, we should know the consequences ofof people who had been affected by some kind
abolishing death penalty such as its benefits andof crimes. It is not strange that people who lost
threats to the society, its effectiveness and itstheir loved ones will behave emotionally and
role in the international arena.support the death penalty. "An eye for an eye"
Individuals and organizations who oppose thementality is the basic reason these people support
death penalty claim that it violates the right to lifedeath penalty. After the pain, they can no longer
as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration oftake a neutral stand and think about the issue
Human Rights. They also claim that it is anclearly.
inhuman punishment which is ineffective inDeath penalty supporters are also bothered
deterring future crimes.because they believe life-time imprisonment of
Those, who support the death penalty, claim thatcriminals is a waste of taxpayer's money. They
death penalty is effective in deterring futureprefer criminals to be sent to death row than
crimes and keep the society a better place to livebeing taken care of for a life-time (Thibault).
in. They also believe that there should beAlthough many organizations define the death
alternative punishments for different crimes andpenalty an unusual punishment, some supporters
death penalty is a kind of punishment someargue that the framers of the constitution
criminals deserve.supported death penalty and constructed laws to
While opponents claim there is no solid evidencepractice it, so it is not unusual. Supreme Court
of deterrence, people who support the deathJustice Antonin Scalia, after reviewing Callins v.
penalty argue that our society is not able to seeCollins case, observed that:
the results of what is not happening. This is likeThe Fifth Amendment provides that '[n]o persons
hearing the news of the shipwrecks, but notshall be held to answer for a capital...crime, unless
hearing any news on the ones that arrived safelyon a presentment or indictment of a Grand
to the harbor.Jury...nor be deprived of life...without the due
Practice of death penalty always carries the riskprocess of law.' This clearly permits the death
of taking innocent lives. Cooper shows proof ofpenalty to be imposed, and establishes beyond
this risk when she says, "75 people were releaseddoubt that the death penalty is not one of the
from death row after courts reversed their'cruel and unusual punishments' prohibited by the
convictions" (Cooper). Those, who support theEighth Amendment (Scalia).
death penalty, believe that it is extremely a smallOne other issue is that United States has not
risk and it is decreasing as forensic scienceabolished the death penalty for youths. Juveniles
improves. They also believe that execution of ando not have the same moral reasoning as adults
innocent inmate is a even smaller chance than theso there should be an alternative way of punishing
releasing a criminal. This is credited to the carefulthem. According to Schiraldi, this does not look
observations made before the execution. Thegood on the international arena as well. He states
Jogger case is an example of false convictions.this well, where he says: "Over the last three
"...the faulty convictions of five teenagers in 1989years, aside from the United States, only
would have never come to light" (Halpern).Pakistan, Iran and the Republic of Congo have
Organizations such as the "Amnesty International"executed juvenile offenders --hardly the kind of
show the fact that, "death penalty punishes thehuman rights company we should be keeping"
poor" as a reason to abolish it. Good judicial(Schiraldi).
representation often results in less or no penalty,Abolishing the death penalty is a requirement for
but it costs too much to be represented by ajoining the European Union. Republic of Turkey,
good lawyer. This situation might result in changingwho was waiting at the gates of the European
a death row sentence to a life long imprisonmentUnion for a longtime, has taken steps to abolish
for a wealthy criminal. According to Mary H.death penalty although it has not been practiced
Cooper, "poor inmates often do not receivefor a long time. Abolishing the death penalty and
adequate legal counsel" (Cooper).practice of human rights laws is becoming a more
Victim's rights organizations argue that the deathimportant issue in the international arena. "Turkey
penalty, in fact, does not discriminate the poor.has been praised for laws adopted in August to
This accusation can not be an argument againstabolish death penalty in peacetime" (Houston
death penalty because it is an argument against allChronicle).
types of punishment. The only way to solve thisI believe it is not possible to end killings by
issue is to improve the justice system, which isexecuting murders. For a better society, we
not easily done.should be more responsible for human rights. Even
Fairness of death penalty is also questionablethough, it is a very small risk that the executed
because the prosecutor may choose to go forwill be innocent, I believe it is not worth it. It is
the death penalty or life-time imprisonment. Somealso becoming a necessity to abolish death penalty
prosecutors always seek for the death penaltyfor the sake of humanity in the international
and others may never consider this penalty, thisarena. Every country should take further steps to
circumstance discriminates between types ofact according to United Nations' Universal
prosecution. There is also evidence thatDeclaration of Human Rights. United States should
"prosecutors seek for death penalty morenot be in the same class of countries who
frequently when the victim is black than when thepractice death penalty and be an example as it is
victim is white" (Cooper).in other issues. Death penalty should be abolished
Another threat of the death penalty to society isat all so that it will no more be an alternative to
the effect of the execution on relatives andkill for vengeance.