The Whistleblower Protection Law

It was not until 1986 when a law protectingthe case is not resolved immediately, the
whistleblowers is made. Congress added anadministrative law judge may then preside over
anti-retaliation protection to the then existing Falsethe only evidentiary hearing that may take place.
Claims Act.A whistleblower should not attempt to delay an
A whistleblower is a person who tells oninvestigation of the possible legal remedy. To
something he believes is an illegal act. Themaintain this ruling, the retaliation should then be
employees are the most commonly knownbrought to the attention of an appropriate
whistleblower. They tell on their employers whichgovernment official within 30 days, else the
they suspect is doing or committing an illegal act.complaint could not be pursued.
Under the Whistleblower Protection Law, theMost states have some sort of statutory or
employee should not be discharged, denoted,common law "whistleblower" or anti-retaliation
suspended, threatened or harassed in any formlaws. Like the federal whistleblower laws, not
that discriminates the terms and conditions of hisevery lawyer will know about these laws,
employment because of the legal act done by theespecially laws outside their own state.
employee.These states and the District of Columbia have
The employee may be of aid in many waysrecognized a public policy exception to the
possible on the investigation, testimony and the"employment at will doctrine": Alaska, Arizona,
likes. However there are some constraints underArkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida,
the whistleblower protection law.Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas,
Reporting illegal acts that are only within theKentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland,
company is a ground for exemption. But still thereMassachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri,
may be public policies that could protect theMontana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New
employee from retaliationJersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota,
If it turns out that an employer didn't actuallyOhio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode
break a law, the employee is still entitled toIsland, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia,
whistle blower protection from retaliation, if heWashington, West Virginia, Wisconsin and
reasonably believed that the employer committedWyoming.
an illegal act.Some states have explicit statutory protections
The whistleblower protection law does not coverfor whistleblowers. These include: California,
employer retaliation for complaints about personalConnecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Louisiana,
loathe. Office politics is not to be used as a basisMaine, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New
for filing a complaint against the employer and useHampshire, New Jersey, New York, North
the whistleblower protection for personal gain.Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, Tennessee,
In order for the employee to be protected fromand Washington.
employer retaliation, he may the have aThere are also state laws that offer special
suspected desecration of any Federal Law. Butprotections just for their own state or local
the supposed violation should have provisions thatgovernment employees: Alaska, Arizona,
the law violated will protect whistleblowers.California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia,
The Whistleblower Federal Law, unlike the FalseHawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky,
Claims Act, allows the whistleblower to file aLouisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts,
lawsuit in a federal court. The FederalMinnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New
Whistleblower Law does not permit theHampshire, New Jersey, New York, North
whistleblower to go directly to the court.Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania,
The individuals concerned are pursuedRhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota,
administratively. These individuals concerned couldTennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington, West
file a complaint or charge to retaliate with orVirginia and Wisconsin.
without a lawyer to represent them. However if