Earmarking our Way to Oblivion

James Madison once remarked, "with respect toThune of South Dakota under what authority of
the two words 'general welfare,' I have alwaysArticle I, Section 8 he sought fit to secure over
regarded them as qualified by the detail oftwo million dollars in federal loans for the Dakota,
powers connected with them. To take them in aMinnesota, and Eastern Railroad because they
literal and unlimited sense would be aweren't making enough money on their own to
metamorphosis of the Constitution into apay for improvements and expansions?
character which there is a host of proofs was notOh, but let's not forget Democrat Senator Robert
contemplated by its creators." In writing thatByrd who, if the truth be known, has more than
letter to James Robertson, he reiterated thehis share of buildings in the state of West Virginia
sentiments he shared with the nation in Federalistnamed after him because of all the money he has
41 where he denounced objections by thebrought back to help build them. Not to mention
anti-Federalists to the term "general Welfare"that he has secured money for such
being included in the Constitution because of it'sunconstitutional projects like the "the Wood
presumption of an unlimited and open endedEducation and Resource Center". $2.7 million of our
scope as without "color".tax dollars went to that to teach you and I about
The fear of federally elected politicians being ablewood.
to curry favor with their constituents by bringingThank God for government! I do not know how I
home the bacon in the sense of tax dollars waswould have learned anything about wood without
why under the Constitution our government wasthis great organization! Honestly, the average
given only limited powers to tax and spend. TheAmerican probably knows more about wood than
founders knew that what have become knownanyone at that ridiculous place though. And those
as "earmarks" would not serve this nation wellthat have taken this money are no doubt busy
and would corrupt the intent of limitedstudying the contents of Mr. Byrd's head
government.apparently; a perfect specimen of wood.
Why did Madison and the vast majority ofAnd while we're in West Virginia, let's not forget
Federalists say that the "general Welfare" clauseabout Byrd's partner in crime, Representative
was limited to the set conditions that followed?Allan Mollohan, who funneled $250 million dollars to
So that leaders of our government couldn't buynon-profits which he himself set up. Conflict of
votes!interest?
Over the years since however we have basicallyOr what about John Murtha? Ah yes, good old
amended the Constitution through court ordersJohn ... the man has more money going to his
and legislation (neither of which are means bydistrict, which includes Johnstown, PA for
which such action can be achieved mind you) to"defense" projects that it is amazing there aren't
say to heck with all that nonsense! And we seeaircraft carriers sitting in Laurel Ridge State Park!
where it is now getting us. "General Welfare" hasAnd all the while, the people who these
come to mean anything and everything someCongressmen represent as well as those of
politico in Washington can dream up.countless others with their hands in the proverbial
What do we have today? We have Republican"cookie jar" cheer. "What great things they are
Congressmen from Alaska like Senator Teddoing for our region!" they cry as they fawn over
Stevens and Representative Don Young that arethe money. And they empower our elected
kings of pork barrel spending and who year afterofficials to continue to push for these monies
year take money home to their state for petyear after year. And year after year we spend
projects such as the affectionately called "bridgemore and more on these earmarks at huge cost
to nowhere" among many, many others.to the tax payers.
We have people like Rep. Sam Farr, Democrat,But that's ok right? Because the evil "rich" pay
CA who pushed for $25 million to benefit spinachthose taxes. And we know they are not paying
growers to be added to an "emergency"their "fair share" right? And then we wonder why
supplemental spending bill. Must be some spinachwe are paying so much more for the goods and
"emergency" we are not aware of!services we buy as these costs are passed on to
Then there is House Agriculture Committeeus.
Chairman Collin Peterson, Democrat, MinnesotaMeanwhile? These politicians are laughing all the
who continues to send taxpayer dollars each yearway to the bank. Because they know you will
to mega-farms and giving 50% of the money forkeep voting for them as long as they bring home
unconstitutional subsidies to just 4% of America'sthe pork and train you to salivate on cue. Yes,
farmers.they've got us right where they want us.
Perhaps we should ask Republican Senator John