Earmarking Our Way To Oblivion

James Madison once remarked, "with respect toPerhaps we should ask Republican Senator John
the two words general welfare, I have alwaysThune of South Dakota under what authority of
regarded them as qualified by the detail ofArticle I, Section 8 he sought fit to secure over
powers connected with them. To take them in atwo million dollars in federal loans for the Dakota,
literal and unlimited sense would be aMinnesota, and Eastern Railroad because they
metamorphosis of the Constitution into aweren't making enough money on their own to
character which there is a host of proofs was notpay for improvements and expansions?
contemplated by its creators." In writing thatOh, but let's not forget Democrat Senator Robert
letter to James Robertson, he reiterated theByrd who, if the truth be known, has more than
sentiments he shared with the nation in Federalisthis share of buildings in the state of West Virginia
41 where he denounced objections by thenamed after him because of all the money he has
anti-Federalists to the term "general Welfare"brought back to help build them. Not to mention
being included in the Constitution because of it'sthat he has secured money for such
presumption of an unlimited and open endedunconstitutional projects like the "the Wood
scope as without "color".Education and Resource Center". $2.7 million of our
The fear of federally elected politicians being abletax dollars went to that to teach you and I about
to curry favor with their constituents by bringingwood.
home the bacon in the sense of tax dollars wasThank God for government! I do not know how I
why under the Constitution our government waswould have learned anything about wood without
given only limited powers to tax and spend. Thethis great organization! Honestly, the average
founders knew that what have become knownAmerican probably knows more about wood than
as "earmarks" would not serve this nation wellanyone at that ridiculous place though. And those
and would corrupt the intent of limitedthat have taken this money are no doubt busy
government.studying the contents of Mr. Byrd's head
Why did Madison and the vast majority ofapparently; a perfect specimen of wood.
Federalists say that the "general Welfare" clauseAnd while we're in West Virginia, let's not forget
was limited to the set conditions that followed?about Byrd's partner in crime, Representative
So that leaders of our government couldn't buyAllan Mollohan, who funneled $250 million dollars to
votes!non-profits which he himself set up. Conflict of
Over the years since however we have basicallyinterest?Or what about John Murtha? Ah yes,
amended the Constitution through court ordersgood old John ... the man has more money going
and legislation (neither of which are means byto his district, which includes Johnstown, PA for
which such action can be achieved mind you) to"defense" projects that it is amazing there aren't
say to heck with all that nonsense! And we seeaircraft carriers sitting in Laurel Ridge State Park!
where it is now getting us. "General Welfare" hasAnd all the while, the people who these
come to mean anything and everything someCongressmen represent as well as those of
politico in Washington can dream up.countless others with their hands in the proverbial
What do we have today? We have Republican"cookie jar" cheer. "What great things they are
Congressmen from Alaska like Senator Teddoing for our region!" they cry as they fawn over
Stevens and Representative Don Young that arethe money. And they empower our elected
kings of pork barrel spending and who year afterofficials to continue to push for these monies
year take money home to their state for petyear after year. And year after year we spend
projects such as the affectionately called "bridgemore and more on these earmarks at huge cost
to nowhere" among many, many others.to the tax payers.
We have people like Rep. Sam Farr, Democrat,But that's ok right? Because the evil "rich" pay
CA who pushed for $25 million to benefit spinachthose taxes. And we know they are not paying
growers to be added to an "emergency"their "fair share" right? And then we wonder why
supplemental spending bill. Must be some spinachwe are paying so much more for the goods and
"emergency" we are not aware of!services we buy as these costs are passed on to
Then there is House Agriculture Committeeus.
Chairman Collin Peterson, Democrat, MinnesotaMeanwhile? These politicians are laughing all the
who continues to send taxpayer dollars each yearway to the bank. Because they know you will
to mega-farms and giving 50% of the money forkeep voting for them as long as they bring home
unconstitutional subsidies to just 4% of America'sthe pork and train you to salivate on cue. Yes,
farmers.they've got us right where they want us.